Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1742
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 315
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1668 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2185
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1668 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2185
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 1742 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9124 vs 8750
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 2846
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 2846
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9124 vs 8750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 2846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 2846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 1742 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 315 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 | 9124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2185 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Tropo |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 993 | 896 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |