Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI FireGL V3600

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI FireGL V3600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 73 Watt
• 256x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 256 MB
• 11x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 180
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1755
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1755

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V3600

• 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 120 vs 72
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V3600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 180
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1755

Compare specifications (specs)