Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 6x more pipelines: 72 vs 12
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 256x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 256 MB
• 21.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 92
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 236

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 92
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 236

Compare specifications (specs)