Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 72 vs 40
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 128x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 512 MB
• 16.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 123
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 782
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 782

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250

• Around 98% higher core clock speed: 594 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 123
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 408
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 782

Compare specifications (specs)