Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 14x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 141
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 568
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 568

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP

• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 498 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 141
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 568
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 568

Compare specifications (specs)