Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 888 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 42.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 32.718
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 1152 vs 72
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 450.087
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 3.059
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 25.346
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 vs 67.077
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 1668
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 32.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 1021.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 3.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 56.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 67.697
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3325

Compare specifications (specs)