Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1947
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 324
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8724 vs 5977
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 20.831
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 324 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8724 vs 5977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 vs 20.831 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 960 vs 72
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 2846
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1668
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 2846
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 vs 2846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 vs 2846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 324 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8724 | 5977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | 20.831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 830 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 3 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |