Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 42.463
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 2.933
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3903 vs 1978
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 361
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11297 vs 8750
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 450.087
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 25.346
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 67.077
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1668
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 3903
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 512
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 11297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3329

Compare specifications (specs)