Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 21.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 338
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 8601
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 29.528
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 2.486
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3331
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 960 vs 72
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2792 vs 1978
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 450.087
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 vs 25.346
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 vs 67.077
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1668
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 2792
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 8601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 29.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 731.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 2.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 42.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 87.659
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3331

Compare specifications (specs)