Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 225
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 22.828
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 210.585
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 10 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 vs 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 vs 210.585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3026 vs 1978
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10102 vs 8750
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.416 vs 3.059
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 vs 25.346
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 67.077
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2846
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1668
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2846
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3026 vs 1978 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10102 vs 8750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 vs 3.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 vs 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 vs 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 3026 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 | 10102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 3.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 10 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 992 | 897 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelArc A350M
