Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
• 21.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 6659
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 18.437
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 427.88
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 1.897
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 vs 23.742
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 vs 61.965
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3321
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 10.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 72
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1978
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 361
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1668
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 2723
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 417
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 6659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 18.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 1.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3321

Compare specifications (specs)