Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 127 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 434
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 21 October 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 127 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 434 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 1,488.0 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1974 vs 1461
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3489 vs 2475
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3489 vs 2475
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 958
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2304
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,488.0 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1974 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3489 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3489 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 1974 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 3489 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4461 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.609 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Barts |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 819 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 127 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | AGP | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |