Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon HD 6950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 33.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 500 Watt
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 437

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
• 29.3x more pipelines: 1408 vs 48
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2613 vs 1461
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3652 vs 2475
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3652 vs 2475
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6114 vs 4463
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2523 vs 958
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2523 vs 958
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 2304
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1461 2613
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	569 437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3652
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4463 6114
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 2523
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 11657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 11657

Compare specifications (specs)