Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1306
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 2181
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 2181
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 2014
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 2014

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 569
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4806 vs 4463
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 958
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1461 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	569 751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2181
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4463 4806
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 2014

Compare specifications (specs)