Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1306
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 2181
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 2181
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 2014
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 2014
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 1306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 vs 2014 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 569
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4806 vs 4463
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 958
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 958
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 569 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4806 vs 4463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 958 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 2181 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4463 | 4806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 2014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Mars |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 855 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |