Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 382
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 October 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 382 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1461
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2475
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2475
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10752 vs 4466
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 958
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2304
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2745 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 vs 2475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10752 vs 4466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 2745 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 4175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4466 | 10752 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 789 | 819 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |