Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 382
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 1 October 2012
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

  • 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
  • Around 42% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1461
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2475
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2475
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10752 vs 4466
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 958
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2304
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 960 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,256 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2745 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4175 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4175 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 10752 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3383 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3383 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
2745
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4175
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4466
10752
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3334
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 2745
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 4175
Geekbench - OpenCL 4466 10752
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.895

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK104
Launch date 5 September 2014 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 789 819
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 1,256 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 960
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 960

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized large
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA