Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 512

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 60 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 512

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
Around 57% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3903 vs 1461
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2475
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2475
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11281 vs 4463
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 958
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 958
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2304
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3903 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL	11281 vs 4463
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3903

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

512

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

4843

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4463

11281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3329

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	3903
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	512
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	4843
Geekbench - OpenCL	4463	11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	3329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		133.458
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1265

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Maxwell
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GM107
Launch date	5 September 2014	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	790	700
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	640
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Shared memory	1	0
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5.4 GB/s
Memory type		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA