Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 338
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 30 May 2013
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
  • 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
  • Around 73% better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2792 vs 1461
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2475
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2475
  • Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8601 vs 4461
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 958
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2304
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 811 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 63.76 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,530 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2792 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4133 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4133 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 8601 vs 4461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3651 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3651 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3331 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3331 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
2792
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4133
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4461
8601
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3331
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3331
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 2792
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 4133
Geekbench - OpenCL 4461 8601
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 29.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 731.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 42.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 87.659
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 964

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK106
Launch date 5 September 2014 30 May 2013
Place in performance rating 790 842
Type Laptop Laptop
Launch price (MSRP) $189.99
Price now $177.99
Value for money (0-100) 19.67

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 797 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 811 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 1,530 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 960
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 63.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,540 million
CUDA cores 960

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized large
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA