Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 412
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 11 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 412 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3879 vs 1461
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 2475
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 2475
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12452 vs 4461
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 958
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2304
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3879 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 2475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12452 vs 4461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 3879 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 4868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4461 | 12452 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 770 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |