Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 412
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 11 May 2013
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 412

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
  • 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
  • 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3879 vs 1461
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 2475
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 2475
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12452 vs 4461
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 958
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2304
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 102.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 48
Floating-point performance 2,448 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3879 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4868 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4868 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 12452 vs 4461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3679 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3679 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
3879
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4868
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4461
12452
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3351
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 3879
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 4868
Geekbench - OpenCL 4461 12452
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 78.867
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1466

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK104
Launch date 5 September 2014 11 May 2013
Place in performance rating 790 770
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 797 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 823 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 2,448 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 1536
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 102.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 122 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1536

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized large
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA