Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 70 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 467
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 365
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 1820
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 23 February 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 vs 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4466 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | G92 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 23 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 782 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |