Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 3.5x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
  • 5.5x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 160 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 70 Watt
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 467
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 365
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 1820
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 1820
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 23 February 2008
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 70 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 vs 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 vs 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 vs 1820

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
Core clock speed 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
467
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
1820
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 1820

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Tesla
Code name Broadwell GT3e G92
Launch date 5 September 2014 23 February 2008
Place in performance rating 790 782
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 48 96
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 MXM-HE
Laptop size medium sized large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0