Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 March 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 418 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1461
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2475
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2475
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6662 vs 4461
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 958
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 958
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2304
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 vs 1461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 2475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6662 vs 4461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 2723 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 3798 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4461 | 6662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.897 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 888 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |