Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 418
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 1 March 2013
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 418

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1461
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2475
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2475
  • Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6662 vs 4461
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 958
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 958
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2304
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,244 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3798 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3798 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 6662 vs 4461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3651 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3651 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3321 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3321 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
2723
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
3798
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4461
6662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3321
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 2723
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 3798
Geekbench - OpenCL 4461 6662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.965
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 817

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK106
Launch date 5 September 2014 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 790 888
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,269
Price now $225.65
Value for money (0-100) 14.81

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 1,244 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 768
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 51.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 134.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 5616 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync