Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 304

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• 2x more core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1961 vs 1461
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 2475
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 2475
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5326 vs 4466
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 958
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 958
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 2304
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1461 1961
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	569 304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3855
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4466 5326
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 4470

Compare specifications (specs)