Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD FirePro M5100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD FirePro M5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 2103
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10003 vs 6311
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 2103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 vs 6311 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 509
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 509 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 2103 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 800 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 6311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD FirePro M5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Venus |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 665 | 643 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
