Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 12.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 72
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3183 vs 2231
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 vs 509
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 vs 1671
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 896 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3183 vs 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 vs 509 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 3183 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Bonaire |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 664 | 641 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $239 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 896 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |