Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 16.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 247 Watt
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 428
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10015 vs 9885
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 25 July 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 247 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10015 vs 9885 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.2x more pipelines: 448 vs 72
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2231
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1671
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3175
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 448 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 2231 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 3017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10015 | 9885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF110 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 778 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 247 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |