Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GRID K220Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2536 vs 833
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2536 vs 833
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 539
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 912
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 2 July 2014
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2536 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2536 vs 833
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 vs 539
PassMark - G3D Mark 1626 vs 912

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2128 vs 1586
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2128 vs 1586
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2660 vs 2418
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2660 vs 2418
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2128 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2128 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2660 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2660 vs 2418

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
2660
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
572
539
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1626
912
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2536 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2536 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1586 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1586 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2418 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2418 2660
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 539
PassMark - G3D Mark 1626 912
Geekbench - OpenCL 5885

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK104
Launch date 5 September 2014 2 July 2014
Place in performance rating 724 753
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $469

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 800 MHz 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,540 million
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops
Pipelines 1536
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5