Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 81
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 381
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 81 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 vs 381 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3237 vs 2418
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3237 vs 2418
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 vs 2418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 81 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 381 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | G92 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 1333 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PureVideo HD |