Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 322
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5885 vs 4981

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 25 June 2013
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	572 vs 322
Geekbench - OpenCL	5885 vs 4981

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Around 23% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2536
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2536
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1586
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1586
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2418
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2418
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1687 vs 1626

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3093 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3093 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3504 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3504 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344 vs 2418
PassMark - G3D Mark	1687 vs 1626

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2536

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2536

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1586

3504

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1586

3504

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2418

3344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2418

3344

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

572

322

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1626

1687

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5885

4981

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2536	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2536	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1586	3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1586	3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2418	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2418	3344
PassMark - G2D Mark	572	322
PassMark - G3D Mark	1626	1687
Geekbench - OpenCL	5885	4981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		28.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2148

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GK107
Launch date	5 September 2014	25 June 2013
Place in performance rating	724	983
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	800 MHz	980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,270 million
Floating-point performance		752.6 gflops
Pipelines		384
Texture fill rate		31.36 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5400 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus