Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 410
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 1577
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5885 vs 3873
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 1 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 vs 410
PassMark - G3D Mark 1626 vs 1577
Geekbench - OpenCL 5885 vs 3873

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 2536
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 2536
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 1586
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 1586
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2418
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2418
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2646 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2646 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 vs 2418

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3339
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
572
410
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1626
1577
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5885
3873
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2536 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2536 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1586 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1586 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2418 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2418 3339
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 410
PassMark - G3D Mark 1626 1577
Geekbench - OpenCL 5885 3873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.155

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK107
Launch date 5 September 2014 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 721 973
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Price now $464
Value for money (0-100) 4.14

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 800 MHz 954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 51 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops
Pipelines 384
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5