Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 410
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 1577
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5885 vs 3873
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 March 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 51 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 410 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 vs 1577 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 vs 3873 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 2536
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 2536
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 1586
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 1586
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2418
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 2646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 2646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3339 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 410 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 1577 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 3873 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK107 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 721 | 973 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $464 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.14 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 51 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |