Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1586 vs 1577
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1586 vs 1577
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1671
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1671
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 545
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 vs 1671 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 545 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2536
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2536
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3552 vs 1626
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 5885
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 2536 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3552 vs 1626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 5885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 1671 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 545 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 3552 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GM107 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 724 | 805 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
| Price now | $343.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1600
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
