Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 907 MHz
• 909.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 44.089
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 vs 594.914
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.596 vs 3.46
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 vs 55.755
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4664
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1842
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4664
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1842

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 2688
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 353
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15221 vs 12201
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 193.829

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2688 3453
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	353 679
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12201 15221
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 44.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1138.276 594.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.596 3.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.742 55.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.829 226.93
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346

Compare specifications (specs)