Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 10 nm
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12613 vs 2688
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 353
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 59733 vs 12201
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 5609
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 5609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 10 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 vs 2688 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 vs 12201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | 12613 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 816 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12201 | 59733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Navi 10 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 4 Aug 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 622 | 173 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1499 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | 95.94 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 239.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
