Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI FireGL V3300
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI FireGL V3300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 22000x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 90 nm
- 37.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2688 vs 71
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 October 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 vs 71 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 326 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V3300
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V3300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI FireGL V3300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | 71 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI FireGL V3300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | R500 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | RV515 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 October 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 622 | 493 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 107 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 |