Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI Radeon HD 4270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 55 nm
- 24.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 110
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 303
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 vs 110 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 303 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4270
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 590 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 590 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon HD 4270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 110 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12204 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon HD 4270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | RV6xx |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | RS880M |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 622 | 536 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 590 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |