Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 58
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s
- 8x more pipelines: 3072 vs 384
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 5609
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 5609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 5609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12201 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 58 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 622 | 203 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
