Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 22000x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 33.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 81
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 9 August 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 294 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 294 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Curie |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 622 | 550 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 146 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |