Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4888.9x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 10.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 254
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 317
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 21 August 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 vs 254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 317 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 317 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12204 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Curie |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | G71 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 21 August 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 622 | 498 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |