Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 4271.8x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Exo |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1424 | 1173 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 855 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |