Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 1205 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |