Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • 4224x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 21 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 105.6 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU AMD Radeon R9 M265X
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1244
PassMark - G3D Mark 1138
PassMark - G2D Mark 210
Geekbench - OpenCL 8829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Tiger Lake GT2 Venus
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 21 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1423 1175
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 625 MHz
Compute units 96 10
Core clock speed 300 MHz 575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 422.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 3.379 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.690 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 640
Pixel fill rate 26.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 105.6 GTexel/s 25 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 11
OpenCL 2.1 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore