Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 4224x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 21 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | AMD Radeon R9 M265X |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1244 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1138 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Venus |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 21 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1175 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 625 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | 10 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |