Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1244 vs 720
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1244 vs 720 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1244 | 720 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1159 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |