Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD FirePro D500
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD FirePro D500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1137.9x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 11x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 6020
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 6020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 6020 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17620 vs 14127
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3462
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3214
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17620 vs 14127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 17620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3349 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro D500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 520 | 666 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 243.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
