Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

AMD Radeon Pro 460

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 907 MHz
1364.3x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 4664
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 4664
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1842
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1842

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 30 October 2016
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz vs 907 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462 vs 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462 vs 1842

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
2.4x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15221 vs 14127
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3214
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3214
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 311
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15221 vs 14127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	679 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	3453 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14127

15221

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4664

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4664

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

1842

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

1842

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3346

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

679

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

3453

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	AMD Radeon Pro 460
Geekbench - OpenCL	14127	15221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	1842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3346
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	679
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	3453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		44.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		594.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		55.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		226.93

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	AMD Radeon Pro 460
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	GCN 4.0
Code name	DG1	Baffin
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	30 October 2016
Place in performance rating	520	629
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	907 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	1024
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	58.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	35 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,858 gflops
Transistor count		3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	5080 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0