Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 1650x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1125 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 306
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1204

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3462
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3462
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3214
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3214

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3462 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3462 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3361
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	311 306
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 1204

Compare specifications (specs)