Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon RX 550X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon RX 550X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1287 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 51.48 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14127 vs 8679
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3428
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3428
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3139
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3139
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1287 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 51.48 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 vs 8679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 3139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 3139 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550X
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3214
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 311
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2253 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2253 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 550X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 8679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3349 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 422 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2253 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 550X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Lexa |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 520 | 628 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1287 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | 8/10 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 20.60 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 51.48 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1.65 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512/640 | |
Texture Units | 40 | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |