Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs ATI FirePro V8800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and ATI FirePro V8800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1200x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 66.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 208 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 7 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 66.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1600 vs 768
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36751 vs 14127
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3575 vs 3462
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3575 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 311
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 vs 14127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | ATI FirePro V8800 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 36751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 445 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.27 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | ATI FirePro V8800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | DG1 | Cypress |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 7 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 529 | 703 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1600 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 208 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |