Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1901.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 204 Watt
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 2 May 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 651 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 3404 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3214
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 311
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 397 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 3505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 2 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 520 | 697 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 3404 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
