Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon Sky 900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 60x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1654
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1654

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 900

• 4.1x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 298.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 12

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 900

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1654

Compare specifications (specs)