Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 372 vs 141
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.406 vs 0.154
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 381
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 734
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1717
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 381
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 734
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1717
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 December 2017 vs 7 February 2011
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 372 vs 141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.406 vs 0.154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 724 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1643 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1961 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 724 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1643 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1961 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 4.4x more pipelines: 80 vs 18
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 110
  • Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 1459
  • Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.131 vs 5.113
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 80 vs 18
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 vs 110
Geekbench - OpenCL 2872 vs 1459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.131 vs 5.113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
372
141
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
110
171
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1459
2872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.406
0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.113
10.131
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1643
734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1961
1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1643
734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1961
1717
Name Intel UHD Graphics 605 AMD Radeon HD 6350
PassMark - G3D Mark 372 141
PassMark - G2D Mark 110 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 1459 2872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 66.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.406 0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.113 10.131
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 724 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1643 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1961 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 724 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1643 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1961 1717

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 605 AMD Radeon HD 6350

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 2
Code name Gemini Lake GT1 Cedar
Launch date 11 December 2017 7 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1542 1533
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $23
Price now $50.99
Value for money (0-100) 5.17

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 18 80
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 292 million
Floating-point performance 104 gflops
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR4 / LPDDR4 GDDR3
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 6.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 800 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync