Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 372 vs 141
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.406 vs 0.154
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 381
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 734
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1717
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 381
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 734
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1717
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 7 February 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 vs 141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 vs 0.154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 vs 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 vs 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 vs 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 vs 1717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 4.4x more pipelines: 80 vs 18
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 110
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 1459
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.131 vs 5.113
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 18 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 vs 1459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.131 vs 5.113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 6350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 | 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1459 | 2872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 66.304 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 | 0.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.113 | 10.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Cedar |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1542 | 1533 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | |
Price now | $50.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 80 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |