Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 vs 4.046
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.406 vs 0.371
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 614
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 1162
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1683
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 614
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 1162
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1683
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 15 May 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 vs 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 vs 0.371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 vs 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 vs 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 vs 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 vs 1683 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 96 vs 18
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 377 vs 372
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 110
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1533 vs 1455
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 83.907 vs 66.304
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.791 vs 3.902
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 5.113
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 18 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 377 vs 372 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1533 vs 1455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 vs 66.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 vs 3.902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 vs 5.113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 | 377 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | 159 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1455 | 1533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 66.304 | 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 | 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.902 | 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.113 | 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 | 1683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF108 |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1543 | 1547 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |