Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA NVS 315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 372 vs 302
• Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1459 vs 883
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 vs 2.778
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.406 vs 0.236
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 465
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 942
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1382
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 465
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 942
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 48 vs 18
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 110
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 79.479 vs 66.304
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.705 vs 3.902
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.573 vs 5.113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 315

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	372 302
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	110 180
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.247 2.778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.304 79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.406 0.236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.902 4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.113 6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1382

Compare specifications (specs)